4.5 Review

Proton Conductive Lanthanide-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis Strategies, Structural Features, and Recent Progress

期刊

TOPICS IN CURRENT CHEMISTRY
卷 380, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s41061-022-00367-9

关键词

Lanthanide MOFs; Proton conduction; Mechanism; Progress

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22071223]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review provides an overview of the latest progress in proton conductive lanthanide-based metal-organic frameworks (Ln-MOFs), including synthesis strategies, structural characteristics, proton conductivity, proton conductive mechanism, and applications. Furthermore, the design techniques and future development directions of Ln-MOFs are explored through the discussion of structure-property relationships.
In the fields of proton exchange membrane fuel cells as well as impedance recognition, molecular sieve, and biochemistry, the development of proton conductive materials is essential. The design and preparation of the next generation of proton conductive materials-crystalline metal-organic framework (MOF) materials with high proton conductivity and excellent water stability-are facing great challenges. Due to the large radius and high positive charge of lanthanides, they often interact with organic ligands to exhibit high coordination numbers and flexible coordination configurations, resulting in the higher stability of lanthanide-based MOFs (Ln-MOFs) than their transition metal analogues, especially regarding water stability. Therefore, Ln-MOFs have attracted considerable attention. This review offers a view of the latest progress of proton conductive Ln-MOFs, including synthesis strategy, structural characteristics, and advantages, proton conductivity, proton conductive mechanism, and applications. More importantly, by discussing structure-property relationships, we searched for and analyzed design techniques and directions of development of Ln-MOFs in the future. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据