4.7 Article

Transition boundaries and stiffness optimal design for multi-TPMS lattices

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110062

关键词

Multi-TPMS lattices; Geometric continuity; Multi-scale; Design optimization

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFB1706900]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20202007]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52005261]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By optimizing the design of multi-scale and multi-TPMS lattices, utilizing specific lattice units in different stress regions, the performance and functionality of the structure can be significantly improved.
Nature has skillfully and finely optimized porous structures with specific configurations in different regions according to the service requirements of organisms, thus evolving the heterogeneous structure with multiple functions. In order to further improve the performance and function of the heterogeneous structure, an optimal design method of multi-scale and Multi-TPMS lattices with geometric continuity is proposed in this paper. The geometrical continuity problem of complex transition boundary of MultiTPMS lattice is solved, and correlation mapping between principal stress direction and lattice type is established. In mesoscopic view, density model is used to represent the effective properties of lattice structure. Macroscopically, the design domain is divided into Stretch-and shear-dominated region according to the principal stress direction. By mapping specific lattice cells in different stress regions, the unique properties of different lattice cells are fully utilized to improve the mechanical properties. The experimental results show that the stiffness and strength of the optimized samples are increased by 31% and 21%, respectively, compared with the traditional TPMS gradient density lattice. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据