4.7 Article Data Paper

Fourteen years of continuous soil moisture records from plant and biocrust-dominated microsites

期刊

SCIENTIFIC DATA
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-01111-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC Grant) [647038]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [CIDEGENT/2018/041]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [647038] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drylands cover approximately 41% of the terrestrial surface and soil moisture plays a crucial role in determining hydrological processes and the activity and performance of organisms in these ecosystems. The MOISCRUST dataset, a long-term soil moisture dataset from a Mediterranean semiarid dryland, provides valuable insights into the dynamics of soil water and its impacts on both vascular plants and biocrusts, contributing to a better understanding of dryland ecosystems and their responses to climate change.
Drylands cover similar to 41% of the terrestrial surface. In these water-limited ecosystems, soil moisture contributes to multiple hydrological processes and is a crucial determinant of the activity and performance of above- and belowground organisms and of the ecosystem processes that rely on them. Thus, an accurate characterisation of the temporal dynamics of soil moisture is critical to improve our understanding of how dryland ecosystems function and are responding to ongoing climate change. Furthermore, it may help improve climatic forecasts and drought monitoring. Here we present the MOISCRUST dataset, a long-term (2006-2020) soil moisture dataset at a sub-daily resolution from five different microsites (vascular plants and biocrusts) in a Mediterranean semiarid dryland located in Central Spain. MOISCRUST is a unique dataset for improving our understanding on how both vascular plants and biocrusts determine soil water dynamics in drylands, and thus to better assess their hydrological impacts and responses to ongoing climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据