相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Interchangeability of light and virtual microscopy for histopathological evaluation of prostate cancer
Renata Zelic et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2021)
Improved Prostate Cancer Biopsy Grading by Incorporation of Invasive Cribriform and Intraductal Carcinoma in the 2014 Grade Groups
Geert J. L. H. van Leenders et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2020)
Prognostic value of perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsies: a population-based study of patients treated by radical prostatectomy
Peter Strom et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY (2020)
The percentage of high-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma in prostate biopsies significantly improves on Grade Groups in the prediction of prostate cancer death
Daniel M. Berney et al.
HISTOPATHOLOGY (2019)
Prostate Cancer, Version 2.2019
James L. Mohler et al.
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK (2019)
Evaluation of tumor morphologies and association with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in grade group 5 prostate cancer
Trevor A. Flood et al.
VIRCHOWS ARCHIV (2018)
The performance of the new prognostic grade and stage groups in conservatively treated prostate cancer
Cheng Chen et al.
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY (2018)
External validation of the novel International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Gleason grading groups in a large contemporary Canadian cohort
Helen Davis Bondarenko et al.
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL (2018)
The New Prostate Cancer Grading System Does Not Improve Prediction of Clinical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Large, Two-Center Validation Study
Paolo Dell'Oglio et al.
PROSTATE (2017)
Application of a Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping System to Assess Distant Prostate Cancer Outcomes
Michael S. Leapman et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2017)
Validation of a Contemporary Five-tiered Gleason Grade Grouping Using Population-based Data
Jianming He et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2017)
Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer
Charlotte F. Kweldam et al.
MODERN PATHOLOGY (2017)
Population-Based Validation of the 2014 ISUP Gleason Grade Groups in Patients Treated With Radical Prostatectomy, Brachytherapy, External Beam Radiation, or no Local Treatment
Raisa S. Pompe et al.
PROSTATE (2017)
Prognostic value of the new Grade Groups in Prostate Cancer: a multi-institutional European validation study
R. Mathieu et al.
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES (2017)
Prognostic Value of the New Prostate Cancer International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groups
Anne Offermann et al.
FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE (2017)
Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
Jonathan I. Epstein et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2017)
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System
Jonathan I. Epstein et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2016)
Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome
Daniel M. Berney et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2016)
Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort
Stacy Loeb et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2016)
Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens
Guido Sauter et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2016)
A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score
Jonathan I. Epstein et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2016)
The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part B: Prostate and Bladder Tumours
Peter A. Humphrey et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2016)
Prognostic Value of Percent Gleason Grade 4 at Prostate Biopsy in Predicting Prostatectomy Pathology and Recurrence
Adam I. Cole et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2016)
Disease-specific survival of patients with invasive cribriform and intraductal prostate cancer at diagnostic biopsy
Charlotte F. Kweldam et al.
MODERN PATHOLOGY (2016)
Independent validation of the prognostic capacity of the ISUP prostate cancer grade grouping system for radiation treated patients with long-term follow-up
D. E. Spratt et al.
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES (2016)
Validation of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading for prostatic adenocarcinoma in thin core biopsies using TROG 03.04 'RADAR' trial clinical data
B. Delahunt et al.
PATHOLOGY (2015)
Capture rate and representativity of The National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden
Katarina Tomic et al.
ACTA ONCOLOGICA (2015)
A concordance index for matched case-control studies with applications in cancer risk
Adam R. Brentnall et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2015)
Inflammation, Focal Atrophic Lesions, and Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia with Respect to Risk of Lethal Prostate Cancer
Sabina Davidsson et al.
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION (2011)
Various morphometric measurements of cancer extent on needle prostatic biopsies: which is predictive of pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy?
Maisa M. Q. Quintal et al.
INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY (2011)
High accuracy of Swedish death certificates in men participating in screening for prostate cancer: A comparative study of official death certificates with a cause of death committee using a standardized algorithm
Rebecka Godtman et al.
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY (2011)
Gleason scoring: a comparison of classical and modified (International Society of Urological Pathology) criteria using nadir PSA as a clinical end point
Brett Delahunt et al.
PATHOLOGY (2010)
Measurements of cancer extent in a conservatively treated prostate cancer biopsy cohort
Ramzi Rajab et al.
VIRCHOWS ARCHIV (2010)
Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
Hiroji Uemura et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2009)
Does the Extent of Carcinoma in Prostatic Biopsies Predict Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence? A Systematic Review
Patricia Harnden et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2008)
The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies
Athanase Billis et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2008)
Reliability of death certificates in prostate cancer patients
Katja Fall et al.
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY (2008)
Systematic assessment of the ability of the number and percentage of positive biopsy cores to predict pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
Alberto Briganti et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2007)
The prognostic significance of perineural invasion in prostatic cancer biopsies - A systematic review
Patricia Harnden et al.
CANCER (2007)
Long-term outcome among men with conservatively treated localised prostate cancer
J. Cuzick et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2006)
The University of California, San Francisco cancer of the prostate risk assessment score: A straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy
MR Cooperberg et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2005)
The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
JI Epstein et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2005)
分享论文
