4.5 Article

Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade

期刊

CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 59-70

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S339140

关键词

prostate cancer; prognosis; prognostic markers; Gleason score; virtual microscopy; histopathology

资金

  1. Strategic Research Programme in Epidemiology at Karolinska Institutet
  2. Strategic Research Programme in Cancer at Karolinska Institutet
  3. Swedish Prostate Cancer Federation
  4. Swedish Cancer Society [2011/825]
  5. Sardinian Regional Authority (the DIFRA Project)
  6. H2020 DeepHealth Project [825111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) revised the Gleason system in 2005 and 2014, resulting in improved prediction of prostate cancer death. The inclusion of cribriform patterns as Gleason 4, as well as the presence of comedonecrosis, HGPIN, and higher percentage of cores with cancer, further enhance the discrimination of prostate cancer death.
Background: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) revised the Gleason system in 2005 and 2014. The impact of these changes on prostate cancer (PCa) prognostication remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate if the ISUP 2014 Gleason score (GS) predicts PCa death better than the pre-2005 GS, and if additional histopathological information can further improve PCa death prediction. Patients and Methods: We conducted a case-control study nested among men in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden diagnosed with non-metastatic PCa 1998-2015. We included 369 men who died from PCa (cases) and 369 men who did not (controls). Two uro-pathologists centrally re-reviewed biopsy ISUP 2014 Gleason grading, poorly formed glands, cribriform pattern, comedonecrosis, perineural invasion, intraductal, ductal and mucinous carcinoma, percentage Gleason 4, inflammation, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and post-atrophic hyperplasia. Pre-2005 GS was back transformed using i) information on cribriform pattern and/or poorly formed glands and ii) the diagnostic GS from the registry. Models were developed using Firth logistic regression and compared in terms of discrimination (AUC). Results: The ISUP 2014 GS (AUC = 0.808) performed better than the pre-2005 GS when back-transformed using only cribriform pattern (AUC = 0.785) or both cribriform and poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.792), but not when back-transformed using only poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.800). Similarly, the ISUP 2014 GS performed better than the diagnostic GS (AUC = 0.808 vs 0.781). Comedonecrosis (AUC = 0.811), HGPIN (AUC = 0.810) and number of cores with >50% cancer (AUC = 0.810) predicted PCa death independently of the ISUP 2014 GS. Conclusion: The Gleason Grading revisions have improved PCa death prediction, likely due to classifying cribriform patterns, rather than poorly formed glands, as Gleason 4. Comedonecrosis, HGPIN and number of cores with >50% cancer further improve PCa death discrimination slightly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据