4.7 Article

Functional attractors in microbial community assembly

期刊

CELL SYSTEMS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 29-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2021.09.011

关键词

-

资金

  1. Scialog Program-Research Corporation for Science Advancement
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation through grants to Yale University
  3. Yale Uni-versity
  4. Human Frontier Science Program [RGY0077/2016]
  5. Packard Foundation Fellowship
  6. National Institutes of Health [1R35 GM133467-01]
  7. Donnelley Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that family-level convergence in microbial communities reflects a reproducible metabolic organization, while taxonomic divergence among replicate communities arises from multistability in population dynamics. Multistability can lead to alternative functional states in closed ecosystems but not in metacommunities.
For microbiome biology to become a more predictive science, we must identify which descriptive features of microbial communities are reproducible and predictable, which are not, and why. We address this question by experimentally studying parallelism and convergence in microbial community assembly in replicate glucose-limited habitats. Here, we show that the previously observed family-level convergence in these habitats reflects a reproducible metabolic organization, where the ratio of the dominant metabolic groups can be explained from a simple resource-partitioning model. In turn, taxonomic divergence among replicate communities arises from multistability in population dynamics. Multistability can also lead to alternative functional states in closed ecosystems but not in metacommunities. Our findings empirically illustrate how the evolutionary conservation of quantitative metabolic traits, multistability, and the inherent stochasticity of population dynamics, may all conspire to generate the patterns of reproducibility and variability at different levels of organization that are commonplace in microbial community assembly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据