4.7 Article

Genetic programming with local search to evolve priority rules for scheduling jobs on a machine with time-varying capacity

期刊

SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2021.100944

关键词

One machine scheduling; Priority rules; Local search; Genetic programming; Memetic algorithm

资金

  1. Spanish Government [TIN2016-79190-R, PID2019106263RBI00]
  2. Principality of Asturias [IDI/2018/000176, FPI17/BES201708203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proposed Memetic Algorithm combines Genetic Program and Local Search algorithm to evolve priority rules for scheduling a set of jobs on a machine with time-varying capacity, with specifically designed neighborhood structures for the problem. Experimental results demonstrate that proper selection and combination of neighborhood structures allow the Memetic Algorithm to outperform previous approaches to the same problem.
Priority rules combined with schedule generation schemes are a usual approach to online scheduling. These rules are commonly designed by experts on the problem domain. However, some automatic method may be better as it could capture some characteristics of the problem that are not evident to the human eye. Furthermore, automatic methods could devise priority rules adapted to particular sets of instances of the problem at hand. In this paper we propose a Memetic Algorithm, which combines a Genetic Program and a Local Search algorithm, to evolve priority rules for the problem of scheduling a set of jobs on a machine with time-varying capacity. We propose a number of neighbourhood structures that are specifically designed to this problem. These structures were analyzed theoretically and also experimentally on the version of the problem with tardiness minimization, which provided interesting insights on this problem. The results of the experimental study show that a proper selection and combination of neighbourhood structures allows the Memetic Algorithm to outperform previous approaches to the same problem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据