4.7 Article

The Krohnke synthesis of benzo[a]indolizines revisited: towards small, red light emitters

期刊

ORGANIC CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 1861-1874

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2qo00097k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Polish National Science Centre, Poland [HARMONIA 2018/30/M/ST5/00460]
  2. Foundation for Polish Science [TEAM POIR.04.04.00-003CF4/16-00]
  3. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [860762]
  4. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC0205CH11231]
  5. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [860762] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Benzo[a]indolizines with ordered electron-withdrawing substituents were synthesized. This method allows for refined control of the photophysical properties of the compounds. The ability to substitute various groups on the heterocyclic skeleton offers unprecedented opportunities to study their fate in the excited state.
Benzo[a]indolizines with an ordered arrangement of various electron-withdrawing substituents (NO2, CF3, CN, CO2R and COPh) were prepared directly from pyridinium salts and chloronitroarenes, allowing for refined control of the photophysical properties. Facile entry into almost unknown isoindolo[1,2-a]isoquinolines is disclosed to demonstrate the potential of this method. The rational manipulation of the substituents makes it possible to obtain electron-deficient dyes (HOMO approximate to -5.6 eV) with yellow, orange to red emission, large Stokes shifts (up to 9000 cm(-1)) and fluorescence quantum yields reaching 0.58. Strong emission in spite of the presence of an NO2 group has been rationalized by a large singlet-triplet energy gap combined with small spin-orbit couplings, hence small intersystem crossing. The ability to substitute various electron-withdrawing groups at multiple positions on this heterocyclic skeleton offers an unprecedented opportunity to study their effect on the fate of the molecules in the excited state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据