4.8 Review

Study of the standard model with weak decays of charmed hadrons at BESIII

期刊

NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwab181

关键词

charmed mesons; charmed baryon; leptonic decay; semi-leptonic decay; lepton flavor universality

资金

  1. National Key Research andDevelopment Program ofChina [2020YFA0406400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11822506, 11875054, 11935018]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [QYZDJ-SSW-SLH003]
  4. CAS Large-Scale Scientific Facility Program
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This comprehensive review analyzes weak decays of charmed hadrons (D0/ +, D-s(+) and Lambda(+)(c)) based on threshold data from e(+)e(-) annihilation in the BESIII experiment. Discussions include current experimental challenges and successes, as well as calibrations of quantum chromodynamics and tests of the standard model through purely leptonic and semi-leptonic decays of charmed hadrons, probing lepton universality in purely leptonic decays of charmed mesons.
A comprehensive review of weak decays of charmed hadrons (D0/ +, D-s(+) and Lambda(+)(c)) based on analyses of the threshold data from e(+)e(-) annihilation in the BESIII experiment is presented. Current experimental challenges and successes in understanding decays of the charmed hadrons are discussed. Precise calibrations of quantum chromodynamics and tests of the standard model are provided by measurements of purely leptonic and semi-leptonic decays of charmed hadrons, and lepton universality is probed in purely leptonic decays of charmed mesons to three generations of leptons. Quantum correlations in threshold data samples provide access to strong phases in the neutral D meson decays and probe the decay dynamics of the charmed Lambda(c) baryon. Charm physics studies with near-threshold production of charmed particle pairs are unique to BESIII, and provide many important opportunities and challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据