4.8 Article

Endometrial microbiota composition is associated with reproductive outcome in infertile patients

期刊

MICROBIOME
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-021-01184-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. Igenomix Foundation
  2. Formacion de Profesorado Universitario grant from the Spanish Ministry of Education [FPU15/01923]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [PTQ16-08454]
  4. Miguel Servet Programme Type II of ISCIII [CPII18/00020]
  5. FIS project [PI18/00957]
  6. Spanish Government MINECO/FEDER [RTI2018-094946-B-I00]
  7. Valencian Innovation Council [PROMETEO/2018/161]
  8. European Union [874867]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The composition of the endometrial microbiota is associated with reproductive outcomes, and can serve as a useful biomarker for predicting reproductive outcome.
Background: Previous evidence indicates associations between the female reproductive tract microbiome composition and reproductive outcome in infertile patients undergoing assisted reproduction. We aimed to determine whether the endometrial microbiota composition is associated with reproductive outcomes of live birth, biochemical pregnancy, clinical miscarriage or no pregnancy. Methods: Here, we present a multicentre prospective observational study using 16S rRNA gene sequencing to analyse endometrial fluid and biopsy samples before embryo transfer in a cohort of 342 infertile patients asymptomatic for infection undergoing assisted reproductive treatments. Results: A dysbiotic endometrial microbiota profile composed of Atopobium, Bifidobacterium, Chryseobacterium, Gardnerella, Haemophilus, Klebsiella, Neisseria, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus was associated with unsuccessful outcomes. In contrast, Lactobacillus was consistently enriched in patients with live birth outcomes. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that endometrial microbiota composition before embryo transfer is a useful biomarker to predict reproductive outcome, offering an opportunity to further improve diagnosis and treatment strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据