4.6 Article

Fracture prediction for metal sheet deformation under different stress states with uncoupled ductile fracture criteria

期刊

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 531-543

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.11.023

关键词

Uncoupled ductile fracture criteria; Ductile fracture; Stress triaxiality; Lode parameter; Fracture locus

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [51625505]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91860130, U1937203]
  3. Independent Research Project of State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing of Northwestern Polytechnical University [2019-TZ-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The applicability of eight uncoupled ductile fracture criteria was systematically studied and their predictive capabilities were compared and analyzed through numerical simulation and experimental comparison under various stress states.
Fracture constantly occurs during the plastic forming processes of thin-walled metal sheets due to the local uneven plastic deformation. During the processes, the sheets may experience different stress states, which are crucial factors related to the fracture. To predict fracture in different forming processes, various uncoupled ductile fracture criteria have been proposed due to their advantages of relatively simple expressions and less modeling parameters. Because each fracture criterion focusses on certain aspects of the deformation behavior, the ability of fracture prediction can be dramatically different. Thus, a systematical study on eight widely applied uncoupled ductile fracture criteria is carried out to evaluate their applicability under four different stress states, i. e. pure shear, dog-bone tensile, notched tensile and hydraulic bulging. Each criterion is numerically implemented and embedded into finite element models and is applied for fracture prediction of an anisotropic aluminum alloy sheet. The prediction results are compared to experimental results and the applicability of each criterion is analyzed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据