4.5 Article

Appraisal of the Real-World Effectiveness of Biologic Therapies in Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.09.030

关键词

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD); NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD); Asthma; Nasal polyps; Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP); Biologic; Omalizumab; Dupilumab; Mepolizumab; Benralizumab; Reslizumab

资金

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [UL1TR002550]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This retrospective pilot study found that anti-IL-4Ra therapy led to significantly higher rates of clinical improvement in patients with AERD compared to anti-IL-5/IL-5Ra and anti-IgE biologic therapies.
BACKGROUND: There are no head-to-head studies for patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) comparing any of the 5 Food and Drug Administration-approved respiratory biologic therapies. OBJECTIVE: Explore outcomes in subjects with AERD using biologic therapies in a real-world clinic setting. METHODS: A retrospective pilot study was conducted for subjects with AERD who had been prescribed omalizumab (antiIgE), mepolizumab (anti-IL-5), reslizumab (anti-IL-5), benralizumab (anti-IL-5 receptor alpha [anti-IL-5Ra]), or dupilumab (anti-IL-4 receptor alpha [anti-IL-4Ra]). Clinical outcomes pre-versus postinitiation of biologic therapy were explored including symptoms, 22-item sino-nasal outcome test scores, systemic corticosteroid and antibiotic prescriptions, and emergency room visits related to AERD. RESULTS: Of the 74 subjects, 58.1% (n = 43) had used 1 biologic, though many (41.9%, n = 31) trialed more than 1 biologic. Of the 50 subjects who had used anti-IL-4Ra therapy, 98% (49 of 50) still had this therapy prescribed at study completion compared with 48.6% (17 of 35) and 26.9% (7 of 26) of those who used anti-IgE and anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5 receptor alpha (anti-IL-5/IL-5Ra) therapy, respectively. Among those on anti-IL-4Ra therapy, there was a significant reduction in median total 22-item sino-nasal outcome test scores (51 to 19, P = .0002), corticosteroid bursts (2 to 0, P < .0001), and median number of antibiotic courses for respiratory disease (1 to 0, P = .0469) prebiologic versus postbiologic initiation. No statistically significant difference in those outcomes was observed for individuals on anti-IgE or anti-IL-5/IL-5Ra therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-IL-4Ra therapy led to significantly higher rates of clinical improvement in AERD when compared with anti-IL-5/IL-5Ra and anti-IgE biologic therapies. Prospective studies would help clarify best practices for the use of biologic therapies in AERD. (C) 2021 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据