4.7 Article

Stabilizing V2O3 in carbon nanofiber flexible films for ultrastable potassium storage

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 1434-1445

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1qi01611c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21601003, 21972145, 52172172]
  2. Anhui Provincial Natural Foundation [2108085MB57]
  3. University Synergy Innovation Program of Anhui Province [GXXT-2020-001]
  4. Supercomputing facilities of Anhui University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, carbon nanofiber flexible films with ultrafine V2O3 nanocrystals uniformly dispersed in the skeleton of nanofibers (V2O3/CNF) were designed and synthesized. The films exhibited excellent potassium storage performance, with outstanding cycling stability (98% retention after 2500 cycles at 1 A g(-1)) and excellent rate capacity (175 mA h g(-1) at 10 A g(-1)). The presence of oxygen-bridged (V-O-C) bonds in the carbon nanofibers provided abundant electrochemically active sites and effectively prevented agglomeration-induced volume expansion.
Herein, we designed and synthesized carbon nanofiber flexible films with ultrafine V2O3 nanocrystals uniformly dispersed in the skeleton of nanofibers (denoted as V2O3/CNF). In this structure, the oxygen-bridged (V-O-C) bonds grafted on the inner surface of nanopores in the carbon nanofibers provide abundant exposed electrochemically active sites as well as effectively avoiding the agglomeration of V2O3 nanocrystals to induce volume expansion. Besides, the flexible carbon matrix with porous interconnected channels facilitates the fast transfer of the K+-containing electrolyte and electrons generated in the electrochemical reactions. V2O3/CNF films with unique structural characteristics deliver a good potassium-storage performance with an outstanding cycling stability (retention of 98% after 2500 cycles at 1 A g(-1)) and excellent rate capacity (175 mA h g(-1) at 10 A g(-1)), and the DFT results prove the superiority of V-O-C bonds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据