4.7 Article

A fluorescent zirconium organic framework displaying rapid and nanomolar level detection of Hg(II) and nitroantibiotics

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 859-869

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1qi01190a

关键词

-

资金

  1. SERB (India) [EEQ/2016/000012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel metal organic framework (MOF) was synthesized and used for the detection of Hg2+ in water and nitro-antibiotics in methanol. The material exhibited high thermal and chemical stability, fast response, and low detection limits. Additionally, a paper strip-based sensing technique was developed.
The solvothermal reaction of ZrCl4 with a benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b']dithiophene-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (L1) linker molecule in the presence of a trifluoro acetic acid modulator afforded a UiO-66 type of metal organic framework (MOF) (IITG-5, IITG = Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati). The synthesized MOF material was characterized in detail with the help of PXRD, FE-SEM, FT-IR, EDX and elemental analyses. The material showed high thermal stability up to 390 degrees C in air atmosphere. This porous material (surface area = 1228 m(2) g(-1)) also displayed significant chemical stability in various solvents. The thermally activated compound (IITG-5a) exhibited excellent detectability towards Hg2+ in aqueous medium and various nitro-antibiotics (nitrofurazone and nitrofurantoin) in MeOH. Besides the fast response (1 min for all analytes), very low limits of detection (LODs) were observed for the sensing of all the targeted analytes (LOD for Hg2+, nitrofurazone and nitrofurantoin were 5, 156.7 and 96.3 nM, respectively). A paper strip-based sensing technique was developed for all the three analytes. Interestingly, for the sensing of all the above-mentioned analytes, IITG-5a featured excellent reusability of up to five consecutive cycles without loss of its sensing efficiency. Mechanisms for all the sensing actvities were elaborately explored by means of DFT calculations and analytical methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据