4.7 Article

A Filter Theory Approach to the Synthesis of Capacitive Power Transfer Systems

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JESTPE.2020.3010424

关键词

Integrated circuit modeling; Capacitance; Couplings; Resonators; Bandwidth; Conductors; Frequency response; Capacitive power transfer (CPT); filter; inductive power transfer (IPT); inverter; wireless power transfer (WPT)

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  3. British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund (BCKDF)
  4. National Research Council (NRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we demonstrate how a coupled-resonator structure, which is equivalent to a filter structure, can be used to design a capacitive wireless power transfer (WPT) system. This approach provides access to a wide range of standard structures and impedance scaling methods to achieve matched links.
Resonant-coupled wireless power transfer (WPT) systems are typically modeled as circuits with inductively or capacitively coupled resonators. In a two-resonator system, the transmit and receive resonators are linked by a coupling coefficient, and the coupling can be adjusted for critical coupling, overcoupling, and undercoupling. In this work, we show that the coupled-resonator structure is equivalent to a filter structure and provide a demonstration of how filter theory can be used to design a capacitive WPT system. An advantage of this approach is that it provides access to a wide range of canonical structures and methods of impedance scaling to realize matched links. We show a maximally flat filter has a critically coupled response and an equiripple Chebychev filter has an overcoupled response. There is a relationship between frequency bandwidth in a filter design and spatial bandwidth in a WPT link. Therefore, the filter context can be used to synthesize wideband filters that are more robust to spatial variation than narrowband filters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据