4.6 Article

Progressive Entity Matching via Cost Benefit Analysis

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 3979-3989

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3139987

关键词

Schedules; Partitioning algorithms; Estimation; Sun; Sorting; Scheduling; Licenses; Entity matching; progressive; cost benefit model; data partitioning; data integration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62002262, 71804123, 62172082, 62072086, 62072084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a cost benefit analysis based progressive entity matching approach, which improves matching efficiency and resolution through coarse clustering and greedy scheduling. Experimental results verify the advantages of this method compared to existing approaches.
Entity matching (EM) is a fundamental problem in data preprocessing, and is a long running topic in big data analytics and mining communities. In big data era, (nearly) real-time data applications become popular, and call for progressive EM, which produces as many match pairs as possible in very limited time. Previous progressive EM focus on memory based solutions, but disk based solutions are necessary when dirty datasets cannot be fully loaded into memory. To this end, we propose a cost benefit analysis based progressive EM approach, which partitions data according to coarse clustering results and then iteratively schedules data partitions in a greedy way for high progressive resolution. At first, based on estimated record pair similarities, records are fast coarsely clustered; then, record clusters with near average similarities are greedily distributed to the same partitions, and data partitions are cached. After that, cost model is defined with time and space constrains, and benefit model is defined with expected resolution results. On the basis of the cost benefit model, a greedy approximate method is proposed to effectively schedule data for high progressiveness of EM. Finally, we implement extensive experiments over several datasets to evaluate our approach, and show its advantages over existing works.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据