4.6 Article

Particle Swarm Optimization: A Comprehensive Survey

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 10031-10061

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3142859

关键词

Signal processing algorithms; Optimization; Particle swarm optimization; Feature extraction; Topology; Birds; Statistics; Applications of PSO; binary PSO; evolutionary computation; feature selection; hybrid algorithms; meta-heuristic algorithms; particle swarm optimization; PSO variants

资金

  1. Xiamen University Malaysia (XMUM) under the XMUM Research Fund (XMUMRF) [XMUMRF/2019-C4/IECE/0012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides a comprehensive review of particle swarm optimization (PSO), including its basic concepts, variants, applications, and drawbacks. It also reviews research on utilizing PSO to solve feature selection problems and presents potential research directions.
Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is one of the most well-regarded swarm-based algorithms in the literature. Although the original PSO has shown good optimization performance, it still severely suffers from premature convergence. As a result, many researchers have been modifying it resulting in a large number of PSO variants with either slightly or significantly better performance. Mainly, the standard PSO has been modified by four main strategies: modification of the PSO controlling parameters, hybridizing PSO with other well-known meta-heuristic algorithms such as genetic algorithm (GA) and differential evolution (DE), cooperation and multi-swarm techniques. This paper attempts to provide a comprehensive review of PSO, including the basic concepts of PSO, binary PSO, neighborhood topologies in PSO, recent and historical PSO variants, remarkable engineering applications of PSO, and its drawbacks. Moreover, this paper reviews recent studies that utilize PSO to solve feature selection problems. Finally, eight potential research directions that can help researchers further enhance the performance of PSO are provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据