4.4 Article

Canadian Large Ensembles Adjusted Dataset version 1 (CanLEADv1): Multivariate bias-corrected climate model outputs for terrestrial modelling and attribution studies in North America

期刊

GEOSCIENCE DATA JOURNAL
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 288-303

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gdj3.142

关键词

bias correction; climate scenarios; counterfactual; downscaling; event attribution; hydrology; land surface; large ensemble; North America; regional climate model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The CanLEADv1 dataset includes 50-member ensembles of bias-adjusted meteorological data covering historical and future scenarios, suitable for hydrological and land surface impact modeling, as well as event attribution studies.
The Canadian Large Ensembles Adjusted Dataset version 1 (CanLEADv1) contains 50-member ensembles of bias-adjusted near-surface global and regional climate model variables on a 0.5 degrees grid over North America for historical and future scenarios (1950-2100). Canadian Earth System Model Large Ensembles (CanESM2 LE) and Canadian Regional Climate Model Large Ensemble (CanRCM4 LE) datasets are bias-corrected using a multivariate quantile-mapping algorithm for statistical consistency - in terms of marginal distributions and multivariate dependence structure - with two observationally constrained historical meteorological forcing datasets. For each observational dataset, bias-adjusted variables are provided for two sets of 50-member initial-condition CanESM2 ensembles (historical plus RCP8.5 scenarios, 1950-2005 and 2006-2100, respectively; and historicalNAT scenario, 1950-2020, which excludes anthropogenic forcings), and one 50-member CanRCM4 ensemble (historical plus RCP8.5). The archive includes daily minimum temperature, maximum temperature, precipitation, relative humidity, surface pressure, wind speed, incoming shortwave radiation and incoming longwave radiation. Intended uses include hydrological and land surface impact modelling, as well as related event attribution studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据