4.6 Article

Sex Equitable Prehospital Stroke Triage Using Symptom Severity and Teleconsultation

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.765296

关键词

acute ischemic stroke; thrombectomy; triage; telemedicine; sex characteristics

资金

  1. Innovation Fund of the Region Stockholm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Stockholm Stroke Triage System (SSTS) showed equal predictive performance for LAO and EVT among men and women, despite minor differences in clinical characteristics between sexes, such as age and frequency of stroke mimics in women.
Objectives: We aimed to determine whether there are sex differences in prehospital accuracy of the Stockholm Stroke Triage System (SSTS) to predict large artery occlusion (LAO) stroke, and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), and whether clinical characteristics differ between men and women undergoing code stroke ambulance transport.Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study collected data between October 2017 and October 2018. We included 2,905 patients, transported as code stroke, by nurse-staffed ground ambulance, to a Stockholm Region hospital. Exclusion criteria were private or helicopter transport, onset outside Stockholm, and in-hospital stroke. We compared overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and clinical characteristics between sexes.Results: No significant sex differences in SSTS predictive performance for LAO or EVT were found, overall accuracy for LAO 87.3% in women vs. 86.7% in men. Women were median 4 years older and more frequently had stroke mimics (46.2 vs. 41.8%). Women more commonly had decreased level of consciousness (14.0 vs. 10.2%) and moderate-to-severe motor symptoms (by 2.7-3.8 percentage points), and less commonly limb ataxia (7.2 vs. 9.7%).Conclusions: The SSTS had equal predictive performance for LAO and EVT among men and women, despite minor sex differences in the clinical characteristics in patients undergoing ambulance transport for suspected stroke.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据