4.7 Review

Decellularized extracellular matrix mediates tissue construction and regeneration

期刊

FRONTIERS OF MEDICINE
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 56-82

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11684-021-0900-3

关键词

decellularized extracellular matrix; 3D culture; organoids; tissue repair

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R01AR067747]
  2. NIH/NIAID [R21AI152832, R03AI165170]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ECM constituents play crucial roles in organ formation and tissue regeneration by providing structural integrity and cellular-function regulation. Further research and development are needed to apply ECM more specifically in 3D cultures for different cell types.
Contributing to organ formation and tissue regeneration, extracellular matrix (ECM) constituents provide tissue with three-dimensional (3D) structural integrity and cellular-function regulation. Containing the crucial traits of the cellular microenvironment, ECM substitutes mediate cell-matrix interactions to prompt stem-cell proliferation and differentiation for 3D organoid construction in vitro or tissue regeneration in vivo. However, these ECMs are often applied generically and have yet to be extensively developed for specific cell types in 3D cultures. Cultured cells also produce rich ECM, particularly stromal cells. Cellular ECM improves 3D culture development in vitro and tissue remodeling during wound healing after implantation into the host as well. Gaining better insight into ECM derived from either tissue or cells that regulate 3D tissue reconstruction or organ regeneration helps us to select, produce, and implant the most suitable ECM and thus promote 3D organoid culture and tissue remodeling for in vivo regeneration. Overall, the decellularization methodologies and tissue/cell-derived ECM as scaffolds or cellular-growth supplements used in cell propagation and differentiation for 3D tissue culture in vitro are discussed. Moreover, current preclinical applications by which ECM components modulate the wound-healing process are reviewed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据