4.8 Review

The Alternatively Spliced Isoforms of Key Molecules in the cGAS-STING Signaling Pathway

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.771744

关键词

alternative splicing; spliced isoforms; cGAS-STING signaling pathway; IFN response; antiviral response

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31730018]
  2. Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University [SKLNMZZ202002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alternative splicing of pre-mRNA generates protein isoforms that increase diversity, affecting biological processes like innate immunity. The cGAS-STING pathway, with key molecules undergoing alternative splicing, regulates innate immunity. Protein isoforms in this pathway exhibit different functions in interferon response and can help host avoid pathway overactivation. Viruses can also use alternative splicing to resist host antiviral responses.
Alternative splicing of pre-mRNA increases transcriptome and proteome diversity by generating distinct isoforms that encode functionally diverse proteins, thus affecting many biological processes, including innate immunity. cGAS-STING signaling pathway, whose key molecules also undergo alternative splicing, plays a crucial role in regulating innate immunity. Protein isoforms of key components in the cGAS-STING-TBK1-IRF3 axis have been detected in a variety of species. A chain of evidence showed that these protein isoforms exhibit distinct functions compared to their normal counterparts. The mentioned isoforms act as positive or negative modulators in interferon response via distinct mechanisms. Particularly, we highlight that alternative splicing serves a vital function for the host to avoid the overactivation of the cGAS-STING signaling pathway and that viruses can utilize alternative splicing to resist antiviral response by the host. These findings could provide insights for potential alternative splicing-targeting therapeutic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据