4.6 Article

Microstructural Master Alloys Features of Aluminum-Erbium System

期刊

CRYSTALS
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst11111353

关键词

aluminum alloys; master alloy; erbium; aluminothermic reduction; flux; microstructure; metallide; Al3Er

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aluminum-erbium master alloys obtained by metallothermic reduction show a uniform distribution of intermetallic compounds and grain refinement effect. The microstructure varies depending on the erbium content, preserving eutectic structure at lower content and forming solid solution at higher content. The research provides valuable insights into the production and microstructural characteristics of Al-Er master alloys.
Aluminum master alloys with rare earth metals are widely studied by many scientists around the world, but research on the production of Al-Er master alloys is still limited. The purpose of this work is to study the microstructure parameters of aluminum-erbium master alloys obtained by metallothermic reduction of salt mixtures containing erbium oxide or fluoride. The structural features were investigated by optical and scanning electron microscopy, and the dependence of the microhardness of the eutectic and solid solution fields of obtained master alloys on the content of erbium in the master alloy was determined. Studies have shown that master alloys obtained by metallothermic reduction of erbium compounds from chloride-fluoride melts are characterized by a uniform distribution of Al3Er intermetallic compounds in the volume of double eutectic [(Al) + Al3Er] and have a strong grain refinement effect. The analysis of the microstructure showed that the structure of the master alloys varies depending on the content of erbium. When the content of erbium in the master alloy is up to 6 wt.%, the eutectic structure is preserved. When the content of erbium in the master alloy is 8 wt.% or more, the structure becomes a solid solution with individual inclusions of various shapes and intermetallic compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据