4.6 Article

Heuristics for a Two-Stage Assembly-Type Flow Shop with Limited Waiting Time Constraints

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app112311240

关键词

scheduling; two-stage assembly-type flow shop; limited waiting times; makespan; heuristic

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant Funded by the Korean Government (MSIT) [NRF-2020R1G1A1006268, NRF-2020R1G1A1099829]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on optimizing a two-stage assembly-type flow shop with limited waiting time constraints to minimize the makespan. A mixed-integer programming formulation and various heuristic algorithms were proposed to tackle this NP-hard problem. Computational experiments showed the effectiveness of the iterated greedy algorithm and simulated annealing algorithm on different problem sizes.
Featured Application Manufacturing. This study investigates a two-stage assembly-type flow shop with limited waiting time constraints for minimizing the makespan. The first stage consists of m machines fabricating m types of components, whereas the second stage has a single machine to assemble the components into the final product. In the flow shop, the assembly operations in the second stage should start within the limited waiting times after those components complete in the first stage. For this problem, a mixed-integer programming formulation is provided, and this formulation is used to find an optimal solution using a commercial optimization solver CPLEX. As this problem is proved to be NP-hard, various heuristic algorithms (priority rule-based list scheduling, constructive heuristic, and metaheuristic) are proposed to solve a large-scale problem within a short computation time. To evaluate the proposed algorithms, a series of computational experiments, including the calibration of the metaheuristics, were performed on randomly generated problem instances, and the results showed outperformance of the proposed iterated greedy algorithm and simulated annealing algorithm in small- and large-sized problems, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据