4.6 Article

Staphylococcus aureus from Minas Artisanal Cheeses: Biocide Tolerance, Antibiotic Resistance and Enterotoxin Genes

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12031019

关键词

artisanal cheese; Staphylococcus aureus; biocide; antibiotic; efflux pump; enterotoxins

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2013/07914-8, 2018/17862-9, 2018/02630-5, 2019/03176-9]
  2. University of Jaen [PAIUJA 2019-2020-AGR230]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the tolerance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Minas artisanal cheeses to various biocides, as well as their resistance genes and enterotoxin production. The results showed that a significant percentage of isolates were resistant to at least one biocide and carried antibiotic resistance genes and enterotoxin genes. This highlights the importance of proper hygiene monitoring programs to ensure the safety of these products.
Staphylococcus aureus is a common contaminant in artisanal raw-milk cheeses. Tolerance of S. aureus to biocides is a threat to disinfection in the cheese production environment, while antibiotic resistance and enterotoxin production are additional health concerns. This study aimed to evaluate the tolerance of S. aureus isolated from Minas artisanal cheeses to the biocides benzalkonium chloride, hexadecylpyridinium chloride, cetrimide, triclosan, hexachlorophene, and chlorhexidine, and the simultaneous occurrence of genes coding for antibiotic resistance (mecA, aacA-aphD, and tetK), efflux pumps [qacA/B and smr (qacC/D)], and enterotoxins (sea, seb, sec, sed, see, seg, seh, sei, and sej). Among the tested isolates, 38.2% were resistant to at least one biocide, and 73.1% were positive for one or more antibiotic resistance gene. Most of the biocide-tolerant and antibiotic-resistant isolates harbored efflux pump genes, and were positive for at least one staphylococcal enterotoxin gene. The study highlights the need for correct hygiene monitoring programs to ensure the safety of these products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据