4.6 Article

The Investigation of the Fracture Behavior of a Chinese 9% Cr Steel Welded Joint under Creep-Fatigue Interactive Loading

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11219983

关键词

P92 steel; welded joint; creep-fatigue interaction; fracture

资金

  1. Key Technologies Program of Zhejing Province [2019YFC03112]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang [RF-A2020010]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52075490]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The CF experiments were conducted at 923 K with holding times ranging from 30 to 900 s on a Chinese P92 steel welded joint. Results showed that the failure stage of the welded specimens accounted for 45% of the lifetime fraction, indicating accelerated fracture mechanisms with longer holding times. The absence of a third softening stage in longer-held specimens suggested a transition from fatigue-dominated damage to creep-fatigue interaction.
To understand the premature-fracture mechanisms of long-term service damage of an advanced alloy's (Chinese P92 steel) welded joint, the creep-fatigue (CF) experiments with holding times of 30, 120, 300, 600 and 900 s were individually performed at 923 K. The cyclic softening, inelastic-strain amplitudes and stress-relaxation behaviors were compared between welded and base-metal (BM) specimens. From the results, the failure stage of the welded specimens occupies 45% of the lifetime fraction, while it only takes up 20% of the lifetime fraction in BM specimens with short holding times (30 and 120 s). Furthermore, only two softening stages were observed for both kinds of CF specimens with long holding times. The absence of a third softening stage in longer-held specimens indicates that the processes of macroscopic-crack initiation, propagation and rupture were accelerated. Based on the observation of the fracture surfaces, the fracture mechanism shifted from fatigue-dominated damage to creep-fatigue interaction when the holding period was increased.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据