4.6 Article

A Path Planning Strategy for Multi-Robot Moving with Path-Priority Order Based on a Generalized Voronoi Diagram

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11209650

关键词

Voronoi diagram; Dijkstra algorithm; multi-robot path planning; collision-free; path-priority order

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [110-2634-F-008-005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a new navigation strategy for multiple robots moving in a large flat space, aiming to find efficient paths for each robot without collision. Through simulations, it has been shown that this method outperforms traditional algorithms in terms of average trajectory length.
Featured Application This study proposes a new path planning method called the navigation strategy with path priority for multiple robots moving. It also completely designs the robot's action strategy. The proposed study is suitable for handling or moving more than one robot in a trackless factory environment. This paper proposes a new path planning strategy called the navigation strategy with path priority (NSPP) for multiple robots moving in a large flat space. In the space, there may be some static or/and dynamic obstacles. Suppose we have the path-priority order for each robot, then this article aims to find an efficient path for each robot from its starting point to its target point without any collision. Here, a generalized Voronoi diagram (GVD) is used to perform the map division based on each robot's path-priority order, and the proposed NSPP is used to do the path planning for the robots in the space. This NSPP can be applied to any number of robots. At last, there are several simulations with a different number of robots in a circular or rectangular space to be shown that the proposed method can complete the task effectively and has better performance in average trajectory length than those by using the benchmark methods of the shortest distance algorithm (SDA) and reciprocal orientation algorithm (ROA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据