4.6 Article

Digital Eco-Design and Life Cycle Assessment-Key Elements in a Circular Economy: A Case Study of a Conventional Desk

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app112110439

关键词

eco-design; LCA; circular economy; waste recovery

资金

  1. Conselleria de Innovacion, Universidades, Ciencia y Sociedad Digital of the Generalitat Valenciana
  2. INGEGRAF association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on transitioning towards a circular economy to reduce waste and reliance on newly extracted raw materials. The article introduces an ECO + LCA methodology to help designers visualize the environmental impact of their design decisions, with a case study demonstrating over 30% reduction in environmental impact and more than 11% reduction in costs.
In recent times, there has been an indisputable need to move towards a more sustainable economy, known as a circular economy, which is basically aimed at reducing the consumption of newly extracted raw materials to manufacture products, and thus, reduces waste generation by recycling products beyond their useful life to ultimately close the economic flow of the product. For the economy generated by products to close the circle, it is essential to tackle the problem at the source, that is, the process to achieve the desired product should be conducted by designing the product with environmental criteria (eco-design) and analysing its life cycle from the extraction process to the point when it ends its useful life (LCA). This article presents an ECO + LCA methodology that provides designers with an easy way of visualising the effect of their design decisions on the final environmental impact of the product. This methodology was tested on a case study of a conventional desk, with four alternative scenarios presented and an assessment of their final impact with a cradle-to-grave perspective. The final design obtained reduces the environmental impact by more than 30% and reduces costs by more than 11%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据