4.6 Article

Application of Artificial Neural Networks, Support Vector, Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems for the Moisture Ratio of Parboiled Hulls

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12041771

关键词

drying; parboiled hulls; artificial neural networks; neuro-fuzzy inference; support vector regression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the IR-HA drying kinetics of parboiled hull was modeled and predicted using three different models: ANFIS, ANN, and SVR. The results showed that higher inlet air temperature and IR power led to shorter drying time. Among the three models, SVR performed the best in terms of prediction performance.
Drying as an effective method for preservation of crop products is affected by various conditions and to obtain optimum drying conditions it is needed to be evaluated using modeling techniques. In this study, an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector regression (SVR) was used for modeling the infrared-hot air (IR-HA) drying kinetics of parboiled hull. The ANFIS, ANN, and SVR were fed with 3 inputs of drying time (0-80 min), drying temperature (40, 50, and 60 degrees C), and two levels of IR power (0.32 and 0.49 W/cm(2)) for the prediction of moisture ratio (MR). After applying different models, several performance prediction indices, i.e., correlation coefficient (R-2), mean square error index (MSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) were examined to select the best prediction and evaluation model. The results disclosed that higher inlet air temperature and IR power reduced the drying time. MSE values for the ANN, ANFIS tests, and SVR training were 0.0059, 0.0036, and 0.0004, respectively. These results indicate the high-performance capacity of machine learning methods and artificial intelligence to predict the MR in the drying process. According to the results obtained from the comparison of the three models, the SVR method showed better performance than the ANN and ANFIS methods due to its higher R-2 and lower MSE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据