4.6 Article

Performance of Filter Bags Used in Industrial Pulse-Jet Baghouses in Wood-Based Panels Furniture Factory

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11198965

关键词

wood dust; pilot-scale filter; dust resistance; filtration time

资金

  1. R&D activities of Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznan University of Life Sciences and projects by Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic [VEGA 1/0324/21, KEGA 026UMB-4/2021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study indicates that the dust resistance coefficient of filter bags in wood dust filtration process depends on operating time and filtration conditions in industrial plants; the frequency of cleaning pulses has a significant impact on the performance of the filter bags.
The study specifies the value of the dust resistance coefficient in the process of wood dust filtration in a pilot-scale test stand. The experiments were carried out for one type of filter material-polyester with a PP film previously used in different production lines. Filter bags from the filtering installation of the processing line for narrow surfaces of furniture panels of the honeycomb structure with a chipboard frame, HDF, natural veneer cladding, and a line of CNC drilling machines, were taken into account. Before the pilot-scale tests, the bags had been in use in industrial installations from zero to nine months. All tests were performed under identical filtration conditions. The values of the dust resistance coefficient depend on the operating time and the conditions in which filtration is carried out in an industrial plant, and increased from 6507 s(-1) to 10,208 s(-1) for the bags from the filter of the narrow surfaces processing line and to 29,729 s(-1) for the bags from the filter of the drilling line. The most important factor influencing the properties of the filter bag in the process of wood dust filtration in an industrial filter is the cleaning pulses frequency

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据