4.6 Article

Can IMU Provide an Accurate Vertical Jump Height Estimate?

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app112412025

关键词

IMU; force plate; squat jump; counter-movement jump; vertical jump

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P2-0246, BI-RS/20-21-023]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia-Scientific Projects 2011-2019 Cycle [III47015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that placing an inertial measurement unit on the metatarsal part of the foot can provide valid and reliable data for estimating vertical jump height, suitable for in-field measurement of jump height for athletes. The advantages of this method include the small size of the sensor unit and the ability to simultaneously monitor multiple athletes.
The aim of the present study was to determine if an inertial measurement unit placed on the metatarsal part of the foot can provide valid and reliable data for an accurate estimate of vertical jump height. Thirteen female volleyball players participated in the study. All players were members of the Republic of Serbia national team. Measurement of the vertical jump height was performed for the two exemplary jumping tasks, squat jump and counter-movement jump. Vertical jump height estimation was performed using the flight time method for both devices. The presented results support a high level of concurrent validity of an inertial measurement unit in relation to a force plate for estimating vertical jump height (CMJ t = 0.897, p = 379; ICC = 0.975; SQJ t = -0.564, p = 0.578; ICC = 0.921) as well as a high level of reliability (ICC > 0.872) for inertial measurement unit results. The proposed inertial measurement unit positioning may provide an accurate vertical jump height estimate for in-field measurement of jump height as an alternative to other devices. The principal advantages include the small size of the sensor unit and possible simultaneous monitoring of multiple athletes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据