4.6 Article

Ternion: An Autonomous Model for Fake News Detection

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11199292

关键词

fake news detection; natural language processing; machine learning; stance detection; social media

资金

  1. Deputy for Research and Innovation-Ministry of Education, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia under the institutional Funding Committee at Najran University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [NU/IFC/INT/01/008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel solution for detecting the authenticity of news through natural language processing techniques, consisting of three steps and utilizing various machine learning techniques, with the support vector machine algorithm achieving higher accuracy compared to other classifiers.
In recent years, the consumption of social media content to keep up with global news and to verify its authenticity has become a considerable challenge. Social media enables us to easily access news anywhere, anytime, but it also gives rise to the spread of fake news, thereby delivering false information. This also has a negative impact on society. Therefore, it is necessary to determine whether or not news spreading over social media is real. This will allow for confusion among social media users to be avoided, and it is important in ensuring positive social development. This paper proposes a novel solution by detecting the authenticity of news through natural language processing techniques. Specifically, this paper proposes a novel scheme comprising three steps, namely, stance detection, author credibility verification, and machine learning-based classification, to verify the authenticity of news. In the last stage of the proposed pipeline, several machine learning techniques are applied, such as decision trees, random forest, logistic regression, and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms. For this study, the fake news dataset was taken from Kaggle. The experimental results show an accuracy of 93.15%, precision of 92.65%, recall of 95.71%, and F1-score of 94.15% for the support vector machine algorithm. The SVM is better than the second best classifier, i.e., logistic regression, by 6.82%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据