4.6 Article

Effectiveness of Augmented Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Meta-Analysis

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12041848

关键词

augmented reality; stroke; upper extremity; lower limb; rehabilitation

资金

  1. Research Fund of University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Republic of Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Augmented reality (AR)-based rehabilitation has the potential to improve upper and lower limb function in stroke patients. Studies have shown that AR has a significant impact on both upper and lower limb function, increasing treatment intensity and promoting motor recovery after a stroke.
Augmented reality (AR)-based rehabilitation shows potential to improve upper and lower limb function after stroke. This study aims to review the effect of AR technology in the recovery of the upper and lower limb function in stroke patients. Published randomized controlled trials and observational investigations with adult stroke patients were retrieved from five electronic databases to analyze the effect of the AR systems in improving motor function and balance and gait function for stroke patients. The treatment effect was estimated by standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random effect model for motor function outcomes at the body structure and function, body activity and participation level of the International Classification of Functioning, and balance and gait outcomes. In total, 13 investigations (9 for the upper limb and 4 for the lower limb) were identified. AR demonstrated a significant influence on the upper limb function (SMD = 0.657; 95% CI, 0.287 to 1.026; p = 0.000) and the lower limb function (SMD = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.039 to 1.001; p = 0.034). The present analysis suggests that AR applications could offer options for increasing treatment intensity and promoting motor recovery after a stroke. This approach can be used with the conventional rehabilitation methods as a new intervention for recovering upper and lower limb function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据