4.6 Article

Finite Element Models of a Benchmark Footbridge

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11199024

关键词

benchmark footbridge; running pedestrians; vibration serviceability; SHM; FE model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents and validates two different FE models of an existing footbridge with complex geometry, for vibration serviceability assessments under pedestrian excitation. The models were developed based on detailed drawings of the Streicker Footbridge, and validated against available SHM data concerning static and dynamic tests.
Modern footbridges are often lively structures, characterized by natural frequencies that fall in the range of pedestrian activities, such as walking, running, and jumping. Therefore, serviceability assessment under human-induced excitation is crucial both at the design stage and during the footbridge lifetime. This paper presents and validates two different FE models of an existing footbridge with very complex geometry: the Streicker Footbridge at the Princeton University Campus. It represents a benchmark in the field as a testbed for vibration serviceability assessments under pedestrian excitation. The real structure is equipped with strain and temperature sensors that are currently used to collect measurements in both static and dynamic modes for research and educational purposes in Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). Based on detailed drawings of the Streicker Footbridge, a three-dimensional beam-based model was developed to represent the complex behavior of the full-scale benchmark bridge. Subsequently, a more refined discretization of the bridge deck adopting shell elements was inserted. The bridge Finite Element models were validated against available SHM data concerning static and dynamic tests. The relevant ANSYS APDL script files along with an example of pedestrian jumping application are available upon request for further research developments on the relationship between pedestrians and the benchmark footbridge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据