4.6 Article

Room-Temperature Formation of Hard BCx Films by Low Power Magnetron Sputtering

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11219896

关键词

boron carbides; thin films; magnetron sputtering; mechanical properties; optical transmission

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amorphous BCx films were synthesized at room temperature by single- and dual-target magnetron sputtering processes, and their chemical bonding, composition, and functional properties were characterized. It was found that the film properties depend on the sputtering power and the used targets.
Boron carbide is one of the most important non-metallic materials. Amorphous BCx films were synthesized at room temperature by single- and dual-target magnetron sputtering processes. A B4C target and C target were operated using an RF signal and a DC signal, respectively. The effect of using single- and dual-target deposition and process parameters on the chemical bonding and composition of the films as well as their functional properties were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray energy dispersive analysis, X-ray diffraction, ellipsometry, and spectrophotometry. It was found that the film properties depend on the sputtering power and the used targets. EDX data show that the composition of the samples varied from B2C to practically BC2 in the case of using an additional C target. According to the XPS data, it corresponds to the different chemical states of the boron atom. A nanoindentation study showed that the film with a composition close to B2C deposited with the highest B4C target power reached a hardness of 25 GPa and Young's modulus of 230 GPa. The optical properties of the films also depend on the composition, so the band gap (E-g) of the BCx film varied in the range of 2.1-2.8 eV, while the E-g of the carbon-rich films decreased to 1.1 eV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据