4.4 Article

A multi-criteria decision-making in turning process using the MAIRCA, EAMR, MARCOS and TOPSIS methods: A comparative study

期刊

出版社

UNIV MARIBOR, FAC MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.14743/apem2021.4.412

关键词

Turning; Material removal rate (MRR); Surface roughness; Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); Multi Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA); Evaluation by an Area-based Method of Ranking (EAMR); Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS); Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS); Entropy; Method based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents the results of a multi-criteria decision-making study conducted on sixteen experiments on turning process, using four decision-making methods in combination with two determination methods of weights, resulting in eight ranking solutions for the experiments. Interestingly, all eight solutions identified the same best experiment, indicating the effectiveness of the methods used in this study for multi-criteria decision-making in various cases and processes.
Multi-criteria decision-making is important, and it affects the efficiency of a mechanical processing process as well as an operation in general. It is understood as determining the best alternative among many alternatives. In this study, the results of a multi-criteria decision-making study are presented. In which, sixteen experiments on turning process were carried out. The input parameters of the experiments are the cutting speed, the feed speed, and the depth of cut. After conducting the experiments, the surface roughness and the material removal rate (MRR) were determined. To determine which experiment guarantees the minimum surface roughness and maximum MRR simultaneously, four multi-criteria decision-making methods including the MAIR-CA, the EAMR, the MARCOS, and the TOPSIS were used. Two methods the Entropy and the MEREC were used to determine the weights for the criteria. The combination of four multi-criteria making decision methods with two determination methods of the weights has created eight ranking solutions for the experiments, which is the novelty of this study. An amazing result was obtained that all eight solutions all determined the same best experiment. From the obtained results, a recommendation was proposed that the multi-criteria making decision methods and the weighting methods using in this study can also be used for multi-criteria making decision in other cases, other processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据