4.6 Article

Crystal Phase Control during Epitaxial Hybridization of III-V Semiconductors with Silicon

期刊

ADVANCED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.202100777

关键词

anti-phase domains; epitaxial growth; III-V semiconductors; monolithic integration; silicon substrates

资金

  1. French program on Investment for the Future [ANR-11-EQPX-0016]
  2. H2020 program of the European Union [GA 780240]
  3. Renatech network
  4. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [2016011843]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The formation and propagation of anti-phase boundaries in the epitaxial growth of III-V semiconductors on Silicon is still a subject of debate. Experimental demonstration shows that the main-phase domain overgrows the anti-phase domains due to faster growth. The growth rate difference between the two domains is accurately measured and is influenced by atomic step distribution at the III-V surface.
The formation and propagation of anti-phase boundaries (APBs) in the epitaxial growth of III-V semiconductors on Silicon is still the subject of great debate, despite the impressive number of studies focusing on this topic in the last past decades. The control of the layer phase is of major importance for the future realization of photonic integrated circuits that include efficient light sources or for new nano-electronic devices, for example. Here, it is experimentally demonstrated that the main-phase domain overgrows the anti-phase domains (APDs) because it grows faster. A large-scale analysis of the phase evolution based on reflection high-energy electron diffraction and atomic force microscopy in the case of the molecular beam epitaxy of GaSb on Silicon (001) substrate is presented. The growth rate difference between the two domains is accurately measured and is shown to come from the atomic step distribution at the III-V surface. The influence of the substrate preparation as well as of the growth condition on this distribution is also clarified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据