4.1 Article

Impact of COVID-19 on monthly water consumption on a tropical tourism island: case study of Phuket (Thailand)

期刊

WATER SUPPLY
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 3419-3430

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2021.396

关键词

climate; COVID-19; Thailand; tourism; tropical island; water consumption

资金

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand [64/01/WE/M.Eng, 2565/M.Eng]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phuket, a tropical island in Thailand famous for tourism, saw a significant drop in consumption and residential spending during the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of guest arrivals was found to be the most statistically significant factor affecting consumption, especially in tourism areas, and should be considered in water demand forecasting models.
Phuket is a tropical island in Thailand that is famous for tourism. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the number of tourists reducing to almost zero. Since tourism contributes around one-half of the gross provincial product of Phuket, the impact was so severe that even the numbers of people employed and registered as locals decreased. Analysing the data from January 2015 to March 2021, we found that the total, residential and non-residential monthly consumptions dropped significantly after Thailand's State of Emergency was declared in March 2020. Unlike other studies that reported residential consumption increasing when people are required to stay home for a prolonged period, Phuket's residential consumption decreased by more than 10% from the pre-COVID-19 level, possibly due to the drop in peer-to-peer accommodation bookings. To study the impact on consumption in detail, we modelled using cascade regression analysis by dividing the predictors into three groups, namely socioeconomics, weather and calendar period. The results showed that the number of guest arrivals was the most statistically significant in all types of consumption and should be used as a predictor for water demand forecasting models in tourism areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据