4.6 Article

TDG is a pig-specific epigenetic regulator with insensitivity to H3K9 and H3K27 demethylation in nuclear transfer embryos

期刊

STEM CELL REPORTS
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 2674-2689

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.09.012

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31970822]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China, Stem Cell and Translational Research [2016YFA0100203]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2018CFA015]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2662018PY037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that incomplete epigenetic remodeling during pig cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer can lead to embryonic loss, but a combination of H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 can restore this process. Additionally, TDG is identified as an effective pig-specific epigenetic regulator that can enhance DNA demethylation and blastocyst formation in SCNT embryos.
Pig cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) frequently undergoes incomplete epigenetic remodeling during the maternal-to-zygotic transition, which leads to a significant embryonic loss before implantation. Here, we generated the first genome-wide landscapes of histone methylation in pig SCNT embryos. Excessive H3K9me3 and H3K27me3, but not H3K4me3, were observed in the genomic regions with unfaithful embryonic genome activation and donor-cell-specific gene silencing. A combination of H3K9 demethylase KDM4A and GSK126, an inhibitor of H3K27me3 writer, were able to remove these epigenetic barriers and restore the global transcriptome in SCNT embryos. More importantly, thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) was defined as a pig-specific epigenetic regulator for nuclear reprogramming, which was not reactivated by H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 removal. Both combined treatment and transient TDG overexpression promoted DNA demethylation and enhanced the blastocyst-forming rates of SCNT embryos, thus offering valuable methods to increase the cloning efficiency of genome-edited pigs for agricultural and biomedical purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据