4.5 Article

Quantum Computer-Aided Design: Digital Quantum Simulation of Quantum Processors

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.044042

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intel Research
  2. Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship [ONR N00014-16-1-2008]
  3. Department of Energy Computational Science Graduate Fellowship [DE-FG02-97ER25308]
  4. Canada 150 Research Chairs Program
  5. Canada Industrial Research Chair Program
  6. Google, Inc.
  7. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0019374]
  8. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  9. Government of Ontario
  10. Ontario Research Fund-Research Excellence
  11. University of Toronto

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As quantum processors grow in size, the design of quantum hardware becomes more challenging, requiring the use of existing quantum computers to design and test the performance of next-generation quantum hardware.
With the increasing size of quantum processors, submodules that constitute the processor hardware will become too large to accurately simulate on a classical computer. Therefore, one would soon have to fabricate and test each new design primitive and parameter choice in time-consuming coordination between design, fabrication, and experimental validation. Here we show how one can design and test the performance of next-generation quantum hardware-by using existing quantum computers. Focusing on superconducting transmon processors as a prominent hardware platform, we compute the static and dynamic properties of individual and coupled transmons. We show how the energy spectra of transmons can be obtained by variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms that are well suited for near-term noisy quantum computers. In addition, single-and two-qubit gate simulations are demonstrated via Suzuki-Trotter decomposition. Our methods pave a promising way towards designing candidate quantum processors when the demands of calculating submodule properties exceed the capabilities of classical computing resources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据