4.1 Review

Neonatal pain management: still in search of the Holy Grail

出版社

DUSTRI-VERLAG DR KARL FEISTLE
DOI: 10.5414/CP202561

关键词

newborn; pain; pain management; developmental pharmacology; pharmacogenetics

资金

  1. Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders [1800214N]
  2. agency for innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT) through the SAFEPEDRUG project [IWT/SBO 130033]
  3. NIH [K24DA027992, R01HD060543, U54HD071601]
  4. European Commission [223614, 260908, 223060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inadequate pain management but also inappropriate use of analgesics in early infancy has negative effects on neuro-developmental outcome. As a consequence, neonatal pain management is still in search for the Holy Grail. At best, effective pain management is based on prevention, assessment, and treatment followed by a re-assessment of the pain to determine if additional treatment is still necessary. Unfortunately, epidemiological observations suggest that neonates are undergoing painful procedures very frequently, unveiling the need for effective preventive, non-pharmacological strategies. In addition, assessment is still based on validated, multimodal, but subjective pain assessment tools. Finally, in neonatal intensive care units, there is a shift in clinical practices (e.g., shorter intubation and ventilation), and this necessitates the development and validation of new pharmacological treatment modalities. To illustrate this, a shift in the use of opioids to paracetamol has occurred and short-acting agents (remifentanil, propofol) are more commonly administered to neonates. In addition to these new modalities and as part of a more advanced approach of the developmental pharmacology of analgesics, pharmacogenetics also emerged as a tool for precision medicine in neonates. To assure further improvement of neonatal pain management the integration of pharmacogenetics with the usual covariates like weight, age and/or disease characteristics is needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据