4.6 Article

Construction of an AI-2 quorum sensing induced heterologous protein expression system in Escherichia coli

期刊

PEERJ
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12497

关键词

AI-2 quorum sensing; Protein expression; Auto-induction; Escherichia coli

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31672571]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the autoinducer-2 quorum sensing system was incorporated into the pET expression system, resulting in the construction of the autoinduction expression vector pXWZ1. The expression efficiency of the reporter genes was higher in cells transformed with pXWZ1 compared to traditional pET28a(+) vectors, suggesting that this new system will provide a more economical and convenient tool for recombinant protein expression.
Background. The pET expression system based on T7 promoter which is induced by isopropyl-beta-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) is by far the most commonly used system for production of heterogeneous proteins in Escherichia coli. However, this system was limited by obvious drawbacks including the host toxicity and metabolic burden imposed by the presence of IPTG. Methods. In this study, we incorporated the autoinducer-2 (AI-2) quorum sensing system to realize autoinduction of the pET expression system. The autoinduction expression vector pXWZ1 was constructed by inserting the lsr promoter regions into the pET28a(+) vector. The expression efficiency of the reporter genes gfpuv and lacZ by the pXWZ1 and pET28a(+) vectors were compared. Results. The results showed that the expression levels of the both report genes in the cells transformed with pXWZ1 without any addition of exogenous inducer were higher than that transformed with pET28a(+) vectors by the induction of IPTG. Conclusion. This new auto-induction system will exclude the limitations of the IPTG induction including toxic to host and increasing formation of inclusion body and will become a more economical and convenient tool for recombinant protein expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据