4.7 Article

Low-Threshold Nanolaser Based on Hybrid Plasmonic Waveguide Mode Supported by Metallic Grating Waveguide Structure

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11102555

关键词

nanolaser; hybrid plasmonic waveguide mode; low-threshold; Q-factor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11504209, 91950106, 11674199]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2019MA024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A modified nanostructure with a high Q-factor was proposed to achieve a nanolaser with a lower lasing threshold, supporting a hybrid plasmonic waveguide mode. The lasing action can be modulated by adjusting the thickness of the layers and the duty cycle of the grating, offering potential for designing highly-efficient miniaturized lasers.
A high Q-factor of the nanocavity can effectively reduce the threshold of nanolasers. In this paper, a modified nanostructure composed of a silver grating on a low-index dielectric layer (LID) and a high-index dielectric layer (HID) was proposed to realize a nanolaser with a lower lasing threshold. The nanostructure supports a hybrid plasmonic waveguide mode with a very-narrow line-width that can be reduced to about 1.79 nm by adjusting the thickness of the LID/HID layer or the duty ratio of grating, and the Q-factor can reach up to about 348. We theoretically demonstrated the lasing behavior of the modified nanostructures using the model of the combination of the classical electrodynamics and the four-level two-electron model of the gain material. The results demonstrated that the nanolaser based on the hybrid plasmonic waveguide mode can really reduce the lasing threshold to 0.042 mJ/cm(2), which is about three times lower than the nanolaser based on the surface plasmon. The lasing action can be modulated by the thickness of the LID layer, the thickness of the HID layer and the duty cycle of grating. Our findings could provide a useful guideline to design low-threshold and highly-efficient miniaturized lasers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据