4.7 Article

Polarization-Insensitive Beam Splitter with Variable Split Angles and Ratios Based on Phase Gradient Metasurfaces

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12010113

关键词

beam splitter; Snell's law; phase gradient; metasurface

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61805119]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180469, BK20180468]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30919011275]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a polarization-insensitive beam splitter with a variable split angle and ratio based on the phase gradient metasurface is proposed. It has the advantages of a small size and easy integration.
The beam splitter is a common and critical element in optical systems. Traditional beam splitters composed of prisms or wave plates are difficult to be applied to miniaturized optical systems because they are bulky and heavy. The realization of the nanoscale beam splitter with a flexible function has attracted much attention from researchers. Here, we proposed a polarization-insensitive beam splitter with a variable split angle and ratio based on the phase gradient metasurface, which is composed of two types of nanorod arrays with opposite phase gradients. Different split angles are achieved by changing the magnitude of the phase gradient based on the principle of Snell's law of refraction, and different split ratios are achieved by adding a phase buffer with different areas. In the designed four types of beam splitters for different functions, the split angle is variable in the range of 12-29 degrees, and the split ratio is variable in the range of 0.1-1. The beam splitter has a high beam splitting efficiency above 0.3 at the wavelength of 480-600 nm and a weak polarization dependence. The proposed beam splitter has the advantages of a small size and easy integration, and it can be applied to various optical systems such as multiplexers and interferometers for integrated optical circuits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据