4.7 Article

Examining the Transmission of Visible Light through Electrospun Nanofibrous PCL Scaffolds for Corneal Tissue Engineering

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11123191

关键词

electrospinning; tissue engineering; cornea; transparency; nanofibers; polycaprolactone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzed the light transmission through electrospun PCL scaffolds and its impact on the transparency of nanofibrous scaffolds. Results showed that scaffold thickness, fiber diameter, and surrounding medium play crucial roles in light transmission. Smaller fiber diameter and matching refractive indices help improve light transmission.
The transparency of nanofibrous scaffolds is of highest interest for potential applications like corneal wound dressings in corneal tissue engineering. In this study, we provide a detailed analysis of light transmission through electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds. PCL scaffolds were produced via electrospinning, with fiber diameters in the range from (35 +/- 13) nm to (167 +/- 35) nm. Light transmission measurements were conducted using UV-vis spectroscopy in the range of visible light and analyzed with respect to the influence of scaffold thickness, fiber diameter, and surrounding medium. Contour plots were compiled for a straightforward access to light transmission values for arbitrary scaffold thicknesses. Depending on the fiber diameter, transmission values between 15% and 75% were observed for scaffold thicknesses of 10 mu m. With a decreasing fiber diameter, light transmission could be improved, as well as with matching refractive indices of fiber material and medium. For corneal tissue engineering, scaffolds should be designed as thin as possible and fabricated from polymers with a matching refractive index to that of the human cornea. Concerning fiber diameter, smaller fiber diameters should be favored for maximizing graft transparency. Finally, a novel, semi-empirical formulation of light transmission through nanofibrous scaffolds is presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据