4.7 Article

Compact SnO2/Mesoporous TiO2 Bilayer Electron Transport Layer for Perovskite Solar Cells Fabricated at Low Process Temperature

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12040718

关键词

compact SnO2; mesoporous TiO2; oxygen plasma; perovskite solar cell low process temperature

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [2020R1F1A1074743, 2021R1A4A1031761]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1A4A1031761, 2020R1F1A1074743] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Charge transport layers are crucial for high-performance perovskite solar cells (PSCs), and SnO2 has been investigated as an alternative material for the traditional TiO2 electron transport layer (ETL). However, the successful application of SnO2 ETLs faces challenges such as degradation during high-temperature processes and voltage loss. To address these issues, a bilayer ETL combining low-temperature-processed mesoporous TiO2 (LT m-TiO2) and compact SnO2 was used, leading to higher power conversion efficiency in PSCs.
Charge transport layers have been found to be crucial for high-performance perovskite solar cells (PSCs). SnO2 has been extensively investigated as an alternative material for the traditional TiO2 electron transport layer (ETL). The challenges facing the successful application of SnO2 ETLs are degradation during the high-temperature process and voltage loss due to the lower conduction band. To achieve highly efficient PSCs using a SnO2 ETL, low-temperature-processed mesoporous TiO2 (LT m-TiO2) was combined with compact SnO2 to construct a bilayer ETL. The use of LT m-TiO2 can prevent the degradation of SnO2 as well as enlarge the interfacial contacts between the light-absorbing layer and the ETL. SnO2/TiO2 bilayer-based PSCs showed much higher power conversion efficiency than single SnO2 ETL-based PSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据