4.7 Article

Ingested Engineered Nanomaterials Affect the Expression of Mucin Genes-An In Vitro-In Vivo Comparison

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11102621

关键词

nanoparticles; mucus barrier; inflammation; gut; intestine; safety evaluation; hazard assessment

资金

  1. European Unions Horizon [760813]
  2. Seventh Framework Programme [310451]
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [FKZ031L0020A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that engineered nanomaterials have both shared and specific effects on intestinal mucin expression, with CeO2 downregulating MUC1 and Ag downregulating Muc2. Data from advanced in vitro models were consistent with mouse models, indicating higher relevance for hazard assessment.
The increasing use of engineered nanomaterials (ENM) in food has fueled the development of intestinal in vitro models for toxicity testing. However, ENM effects on intestinal mucus have barely been addressed, although its crucial role for intestinal health is evident. We investigated the effects of ENM on mucin expression and aimed to evaluate the suitability of four in vitro models of increasing complexity compared to a mouse model exposed through feed pellets. We assessed the gene expression of the mucins MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC13 and MUC20 and the chemokine interleukin-8 in pre-confluent and confluent HT29-MTX-E12 cells, in stable and inflamed triple cultures of Caco-2, HT29-MTX-E12 and THP-1 cells, and in the ileum of mice following exposure to TiO2, Ag, CeO2 or SiO2. All ENM had shared and specific effects. CeO2 downregulated MUC1 in confluent E12 cells and in mice. Ag induced downregulation of Muc2 in mice. Overall, the in vivo data were consistent with the findings in the stable triple cultures and the confluent HT29-MTX-E12 cells but not in pre-confluent cells, indicating the higher relevance of advanced models for hazard assessment. The effects on MUC1 and MUC2 suggest that specific ENM may lead to an elevated susceptibility towards intestinal infections and inflammations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据