4.5 Article

Influence of Bio-Coal Properties on Carbonization and Bio-Coke Reactivity

期刊

METALS
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met11111752

关键词

bio-coals; carbonization; gasification; reactivity; dilatation; fluidity

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (FORMAS) [FR-2018/0010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Replacing a portion of coking coal with bio-coal can reduce fossil CO2 emissions from blast furnaces, while also lowering the plasticity of coking coal with the addition of bio-coal.
Coke corresponds to 2/3-3/4 of the reducing agents in BF, and by the partial replacement of coking coals with 5-10% of bio-coal, the fossil CO2 emissions from the BF can be lowered by ~4-8%. Coking coal blends with 5% and 10% additions of bio-coals (pre-treated biomass) of different origins and pre-treatment degrees were carbonized at laboratory scale and with a 5% bio-coal addition at technical scale, aiming to understand the impact on the bio-coal properties (ash amount and composition, volatile matter content) and the addition of bio-coke reactivity. A thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) connected to a quadrupole mass spectroscope monitored the residual mass and off-gases during carbonization. To explore the effect of bio-coal addition on plasticity, optical dilatometer tests were conducted for coking coal blends with 5% and 10% bio-coal addition. The plasticity was lowered with increasing bio-coal addition, but pyrolyzed biomass had a less negative effect on the plasticity compared to torrefied biomasses with a high content of oxygen. The temperature for starting the gasification of coke was in general lowered to a greater extent for bio-cokes produced from coking coal blends containing bio-coals with higher contents of catalyzing oxides. There was no significant difference in the properties of laboratory and technical scale produced coke, in terms of reactivity as measured by TGA. Bio-coke produced with 5% of high temperature torrefied pelletized biomass showed a similar coke strength as reference coke after reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据