4.5 Article

Extrusion-Based 3D Printing of CuSn10 Bronze Parts: Production and Characterization

期刊

METALS
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met11111774

关键词

3D printing; sintering; CuSn10; mechanical properties; characterization

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [218M809]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully produced CuSn10 bronze alloy using FDM method and investigated the effect of printing parameters on its properties. By adjusting printing speed and layer thickness, the density and morphological properties of the product can be controlled effectively. Sintering temperature is a key parameter, with 900°C yielding the highest density and strength.
The interest in producing cost-effective 3D printed metallic materials is increasing day by day. One of these methods, which has gained much attention recently, is the fused deposition modelling (FDM) method. The parameters used in the FDM method have significant effects on the printed part properties. In this study, CuSn10 bronze alloy was successfully produced. The printing speed and layer thickness were investigated as the printing process parameters, and their effect on morphological properties was characterized by using SEM. As a result, it was observed that the formation of printing-induced voids was prevented by applying a layer thickness of 0.2 mm. Additionally, by increasing printing speed, a slight decrease in product density was observed. Following determination of 3D printing parameters which give the highest printed part density, the parts were debound in hexane solution via solvent debinding. Finally, the parts were sintered at 850, 875 and 900 & DEG;C for 5 h to examine effect of sintering temperature on density, porosity, shape deformation and mechanical properties. Although partial slumping started to form over 875 & DEG;C, the highest density (94.19% of theoretical density) and strength (212 & PLUSMN; 17.72 MPa) were obtained by using 900 & DEG;C as the sintering temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据