4.6 Article

Empagliflozin in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in addition to background therapies and therapeutic combinations (EMPEROR-Reduced): a post-hoc analysis of a randomised, double-blind trial

期刊

LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 35-45

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00292-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim
  2. Eli Lilly and Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in addition to background foundational treatments. The results showed that empagliflozin reduced the risk of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization, as well as total heart failure hospital admissions, regardless of background therapy or medication doses. Empagliflozin was well tolerated across all subgroups of patients.
Background It is important to evaluate whether a new treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) provides additive benefit to background foundational treatments. As such, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in patients with HFrEF in addition to baseline treatment with specific doses and combinations of disease-modifying therapies. Methods We performed a post-hoc analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial, which took place in 520 centres (hospitals and medical clinics) in 20 countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. Patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification II-IV with an ejection fraction of 40% or less were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive the addition of either oral empagliflozin 10 mg per day or placebo to background therapy. The primary composite outcome was cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalisation; the secondary outcome was total heart failure hospital admissions. An extended composite outcome consisted of inpatient and outpatient HFrEF events was also evaluated. Outcomes were analysed according to background use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), as well as beta blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) at less than 50% or 50% or more of target doses and in various combinations. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03057977. Findings In this post-hoc analysis of 3730 patients (mean age 66.8 years [SD 11.0], 893 [23.9%] women; 1863 [49.9%] in the empagliflozin group, 1867 [50.1%] in the placebo group) assessed between March 6, 2017, and May 28, 2020, empagliflozin reduced the risk of the primary outcome (361 in 1863 participants in the empagliflozin group and 462 of 1867 in the placebo group; HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.65-0.86]) regardless of background therapy or its target doses for ACE inhibitors or ARBs at doses of less than 50% of the target dose (HR 0.85 [0.69-1.06]) and for doses of 50% or more of the target dose (HR 0.67 [0.52-0.88]; p(interaction)=0 . 18). A similar result was seen for beta blockers at doses of less than 50% of the target dose (HR 0.66 [0.54-0.80]) and for doses of 50% or more of the target dose (HR 0.81 [0.66-1.00]; P-interaction=0.15). Empagliflozin also reduced the risk of the primary outcome irrespective of background use of triple therapy with an ACE inhibitor, ARB, or ARNI plus blocker plus MRA (given combination HR 0.73 [0.61-0.88]; not given combination HR 0.76 [0.62-0.94]; P-interction=0.77). Similar patterns of benefit were observed for the secondary and extended composite outcomes. Empagliflozin was well tolerated and rates of hypotension, symptomatic hypotension, and hyperkalaemia were similar across all subgroups. Interpretation Empagliflozin reduced serious heart failure outcomes across doses and combinations of disease-modifying therapies for HFrEF. Clinically, these data suggest that empagliflozin might be considered as a foundational therapy in patients with HFrEF regardless of their existing background therapy. Copyright (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据