4.4 Article

Applications of RNA Interference in American Cockroach

期刊

出版社

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/63380

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32070500, 31620103917, 31330072, 31572325]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2021B1515020044, 2020A1515011267]
  3. Department of Science and Technology in Guangdong Province [2019B090905003, 2019A0102006]
  4. Department of Science and Technology in Guangzhou [202102020110]
  5. Shenzhen Science and Technology Program [KQTD20180411143628272]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The American cockroach is an important hemimetabolous insect model for research, utilizing RNA interference as an essential tool for functional gene studies. RNAi operation in P. americana allows researchers to quickly obtain dysfunctional phenotypes, facilitating developmental and metamorphic research.
Cockroaches, a sanitary pest, are essential species in insect developmental and metamorphic studies due to their easy feeding and hemimetabolous characteristics. Altogether with well-annotated genome sequences, these advantages have made American cockroach, Periplaneta americana, an important hemimetabolous insect model. Limited by the shortage of knockout strategy, effective RNA interference (RNAi)-based gene knockdown becomes an indispensable technique in functional gene research of P. americana. The present protocol describes the RNAi operation techniques in P. americana. The protocol includes (1) selection of the P. americana at proper developmental stages, (2) preparation for the injection setting, (3) dsRNA injection, and (4) gene knockdown efficiency detection. RNAi is a powerful reverse genetic tool in P. americana. The majority of P. americana tissues are sensitive to extracellular dsRNA. Its simplicity allows researchers to quickly obtain dysfunctional phenotypes under one or multiple targeting dsRNA injections, enabling researchers to better use the P. americana for developmental and metamorphic studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据